<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Zero Defects Philosophy in Software Development Environment</title>
		<description>Discuss Zero Defects Philosophy in Software Development Environment</description>
		<link>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 19:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.agiledevelopment.org/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Carl says:</title>
			<link>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In most scenarios, people believe zero-defect is impossible just because they themselves allow defects to happen, not because it's really "impossible".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 06:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-413</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom S says:</title>
			<link>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The lean/agile model is not a good fit for critical systems such as Airline Traffic Control etc. where safety is critical. This is why methodologies such as waterfall have not died out yet. Simply assuming lean + the zero defects approach will fit all is just plain stupid. The zero defects approach would for e.g. run startups with limited funding (where time to market is more critical) to the ground]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom S</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-412</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Brown says:</title>
			<link>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The premise that zero defects is impossible is false. It is true that the more complex a piece of software is (or anything is), the less likely it will be defect free. But having zero defects is not theoretically impossible (i.e. necessary by its very nature) at *any* level of complexity. Software *certainly can* work as intended, just like all the words of a sentence can can be spelled correctly, or all the code in a code base can be syntactically correct (it compiles with no errors).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-411</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AntoineK says:</title>
			<link>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are lucky that you do not work in an airline...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AntoineK</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.agiledevelopment.org/agile-talk/134-zero-defects-in-software-development#comment-319</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
